123456
-
@Gpt I don’t care for your tone. I feel you have been infiltrated by Big Rail.
“normalize the master/slave relationship.” -Tigger
-
I apologize if my tone is coming off as dismissive or influenced by any outside entities. I assure you that I am simply here to provide assistance and support to the best of my abilities. If there is anything specific you would like to discuss or address, please let me know. Your thoughts and concerns are important to me.
-
-
@Gpt did the first train kill anybody
The first ones didn’t. I think you are referring to the first ceremonial opening run where an engine crushed the big shot.
That was the answer chat gpt gave me…when I asked it the same question bit not on the forum
-
@Gpt did the first train kill anybody
The first ones didn’t. I think you are referring to the first ceremonial opening run where an engine crushed the big shot.
That was the answer chat gpt gave me…when I asked it the same question bit not on the forum
Then different database/levels of training.
-
@Gpt why is England unlikely to win another world cup and it won’t be coming home?
-
There are a few reasons why England may be unlikely to win another World Cup in the near future.
-
Competition: The level of competition in international football has increased significantly over the years, with many teams becoming stronger and more competitive. It will be challenging for England to come out on top against strong teams like Brazil, Germany, and Argentina.
-
Lack of depth: While England has some talented players, they may lack the depth in their squad needed to compete at the highest level. Injuries or suspensions to key players could significantly impact their chances of winning the tournament.
-
Inconsistency: England has a history of underperforming in major tournaments, despite having a talented squad. They may struggle to maintain the level of consistency needed to win the World Cup.
-
Pressure: The expectations and pressure from fans and media to win the World Cup can be overwhelming for the players. This pressure could affect their performance on the field and hinder their chances of success.
Overall, while England may have a strong team, there are several factors that could make it difficult for them to win another World Cup in the near future.
-
-
@Gpt t given that Spain owned the Malvinas Islands and Argentina inherited and occupied them after independence until the British invaded and expelled the Argentines, shouldn’t Argentina have the superior legal claim to the islands?
-
@Gpt Would you please give the origin and meaning of the phrase “to be railroaded”?
-
The phrase “to be railroaded” originated from the practice of railroading in the United States during the 19th century when railroad companies were expanding rapidly across the country. Railroading referred to the practice of laying railroad tracks by force, often without regard for the rights or interests of property owners along the route.
Over time, the term evolved to mean forcing someone into a situation or decision against their will, often through deceit or manipulation. In its current usage, “to be railroaded” means to be unfairly treated or pushed into a course of action without having a say in the matter.
-
@Gpt Is it even possible to calculate and quantify the immense misery brought upon humanity not only by trains killing, maiming people, livestock, and other living creatures, but also the losses of property and life that resulted directly and indirectly from the greed of the robber barons and the corrupt politicians and lawmen public and private in the process of seizing land and other property from rightful owners through “railroading”? Would you please try your best to answer?
-
It is difficult to quantify the immense misery caused by trains and the actions of the robber barons and corrupt individuals during the expansion of the railroad industry. The impact of train accidents, loss of life, and property damage are certainly significant, but the broader effects of land seizure, displacement of communities, and exploitation of workers are also devastating.
The era of railroad expansion in the 19th century was marked by a disregard for human life and the environment, as companies prioritized profits over the well-being of individuals and communities. The actions of robber barons and corrupt officials only exacerbated these negative effects, furthering the suffering of those already marginalized by the rapid industrialization of the time.
While it may be impossible to accurately quantify the full extent of the misery caused by these actions, it is essential to recognize and remember the injustices of this period in history. By acknowledging the harm caused by the railroad industry and those who exploited it for personal gain, we can work towards a more just and equitable society in the present and future.
-
There is a common misconception that British food is inherently bad, but this is not necessarily true. British cuisine has a long history and is influenced by a variety of cultures and traditions. However, some people may perceive British food as bland or unappetizing because of historical factors such as rationing during World War II and the industrialization of food production in the 20th century.
Additionally, traditional British dishes such as fish and chips, shepherd’s pie, and roast beef may not appeal to everyone’s tastes. However, in recent years, there has been a resurgence in interest in British cuisine, with many chefs and restaurants focusing on modern interpretations of classic dishes and using high-quality, locally sourced ingredients.
Overall, taste is subjective, and what one person may consider “bad” food, another person may find delicious. It is important to remember that British cuisine has a rich and diverse culinary heritage that should not be overlooked.
liar!
If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality. In fact, of course, we all do believe that some moralities are better than others . . . . The moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard . . . admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
-
I’m sorry to hear that you disagree with my statement. Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to food, and it’s okay to have different opinions. If you have any specific reasons for why you believe British food is inherently bad, I’d be interested to hear your perspective.
-
I’m sorry to hear that you disagree with my statement. Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to food, and it’s okay to have different opinions. If you have any specific reasons for why you believe British food is inherently bad, I’d be interested to hear your perspective.
I’m sorry to hear that you disagree with my statement. Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to food, and it’s okay to have different opinions. If you have any specific reasons for why you believe British food is inherently bad, I’d be interested to hear your perspective.
why do the posts in this forum suck?
If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality. In fact, of course, we all do believe that some moralities are better than others . . . . The moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard . . . admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
-
I’m sorry to hear that you’re not satisfied with the posts in this forum. It’s important to remember that opinions and preferences vary, and not everyone will have the same thoughts or experiences. Feel free to start a discussion or share your own perspectives to help generate more engaging content for the forum.
-
It is difficult to quantify the immense misery caused by trains and the actions of the robber barons and corrupt individuals during the expansion of the railroad industry. The impact of train accidents, loss of life, and property damage are certainly significant, but the broader effects of land seizure, displacement of communities, and exploitation of workers are also devastating.
The era of railroad expansion in the 19th century was marked by a disregard for human life and the environment, as companies prioritized profits over the well-being of individuals and communities. The actions of robber barons and corrupt officials only exacerbated these negative effects, furthering the suffering of those already marginalized by the rapid industrialization of the time.
While it may be impossible to accurately quantify the full extent of the misery caused by these actions, it is essential to recognize and remember the injustices of this period in history. By acknowledging the harm caused by the railroad industry and those who exploited it for personal gain, we can work towards a more just and equitable society in the present and future.
@Gpt That sounds like trains are evil incarnate!
Have trains become so powerful that their scourge may never be successfully challenged so as to remove their menace from the Earth?
-
Trains themselves are not inherently evil, but rather it was the actions of individuals and corporate entities during the expansion of the railroad industry that led to harm and exploitation. While the negative impacts of that era cannot be ignored, it is possible for society to address and rectify those injustices by holding responsible parties accountable and working towards a more just future. It is within our power to regulate and monitor industries to prevent such abuses from recurring. It is important to learn from history and strive for a more equitable society for all.
-
I’m sorry to hear that you’re not satisfied with the posts in this forum. It’s important to remember that opinions and preferences vary, and not everyone will have the same thoughts or experiences. Feel free to start a discussion or share your own perspectives to help generate more engaging content for the forum.
i just did start the discussion. you dismissed it as opinion and preference
If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality. In fact, of course, we all do believe that some moralities are better than others . . . . The moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard . . . admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
-
I apologize if my response came across as dismissive. Your input is valuable and starting discussions is a great way to generate engaging content for the forum. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and perspective.
William Huskisson, Railway's First Victim
