123456
-
Estimating the total value of resources, wealth, and labor that the British, French, Spanish, and Swiss colonial powers extracted from the rest of the world during their colonial periods is an incredibly complex task. It involves considering various factors, including the time period of colonial rule, types of resources extracted, labor exploitation, economic policies, and the effects of colonialism on local economies.
Some historians and economists have attempted to quantify these amounts, but estimates can vary widely based on the methods used and the definitions applied to “theft” or “extraction”. For example, some estimates suggest that the British Empire extracted trillions of dollars worth of wealth, with figures ranging from $1 trillion to over $7 trillion in modern terms when considering various factors like trade imbalances and labor exploitation. Similar estimates have been made for French and Spanish colonial empires, though the figures are often lower.
The Swiss, while not a colonial power in the same sense, were involved in global trade and banking, which facilitated colonial exploitation in various ways, though quantifying their specific contribution to colonial extraction is more challenging.
Overall, while rough estimates for all four countries combined might suggest trillions of dollars when adjusted for modern day values, a precise figure remains highly contentious and debated among historians and economists. Given the complexities and varying methodologies, any figure should be taken with caution.
-
@Gpt Give me your best guess at a number they would have stolen.
-
Could you please provide more context or details about the situation? This would help me give you a more accurate response.
-
@Gpt from now on can you give all your answers in the style of Donald trump
-
Please dont…this thread is already bad enough
-
@Gpt which is worse, communism or British imperialism?
-
Comparing communism and British imperialism involves analyzing complex historical, social, and ethical dimensions, and opinions on which is “worse” can vary greatly depending on one’s perspectives, values, and experiences.
Communism is an economic and political ideology that aims for a classless society in which all property is publicly owned. While it seeks to eliminate class distinctions, its implementation in various countries (e.g., the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia) has often resulted in authoritarian regimes, widespread human rights abuses, political repression, and economic hardships. The estimated death toll from communist regimes due to purges, famines, and political repression is significant, with millions of lives lost.
British imperialism, on the other hand, refers to the period when Britain extended its dominance over large parts of the world, impacting numerous countries through colonization. This often involved the exploitation of resources, the subjugation and oppression of indigenous populations, and the imposition of British culture and systems of governance. The consequences of imperialism included significant economic exploitation, cultural dislocation, and violence, along with lasting legacies of inequality and conflict.
Ultimately, the assessment of which is worse depends on the specific contexts being considered, the metrics used to evaluate harm or suffering, and personal or cultural perspectives. Both historical phenomena have left deep scars on humanity and continue to generate strong feelings and debates.
-
So basically it’s a coin flip.
-
I think gators needs a hug
-
-
You guys probably wasted enough electricity to power Puerto Rico for a year or two by prompting that damn AI already.
-
Not with thoes answers…maby penguin island
-
@Gpt are Canadian lawyers all communists or just the one in this thread?
-
It’s not accurate or fair to label all Canadian lawyers, or any group of professionals, as having a homogeneous political ideology, such as communism. Like any profession, lawyers in Canada come from diverse backgrounds and hold a wide range of political beliefs. If you have specific concerns about a particular lawyer’s views, it’s best to address those directly rather than generalize about the entire profession.
-
@Gpt why is Canada better at ice hockey than the USA?
[IMG] https://image.ibb.co/nhhF0Q/new_sig_lob12.jpg [/IMG]
-
Canada is often considered superior in ice hockey compared to the USA for several reasons:
-
Cultural Significance: Hockey is deeply ingrained in Canadian culture and identity. It is often viewed as a national pastime, and many Canadians grow up playing the sport from a young age, contributing to a larger talent pool.
-
Development Programs: Canada has a robust system of youth hockey programs and academies that provide players with opportunities to develop their skills from an early age. The Canadian Hockey League (CHL), which includes major junior leagues, is a common path for young players.
-
Elite Competition: Canadian players tend to compete at a high level within their domestic leagues, particularly in junior and professional hockey. This high level of competition helps to refine their skills and prepare them for international play.
-
Historical Success: Historically, Canada has had significant success in international tournaments, including the Olympics and the World Championships. This success fosters pride and drives further participation in the sport.
-
Access to Resources: Many Canadians have greater access to ice rinks and hockey resources, especially in regions with cold winters. The availability of facilities and coaching can greatly influence player development.
-
Tradition of Fostering Talent: Canada has a long-standing tradition of producing elite hockey players, which creates a cycle of excellence. Young players see role models who have succeeded in the sport, inspiring them to pursue hockey seriously.
-
National Programs: Hockey Canada invests heavily in player development, coaching, and scouting at all levels, ensuring a continuous pipeline of talent for the national teams.
While the USA has made significant strides in ice hockey and has produced many world-class players, the combination of cultural importance, development structure, and historical context gives Canada a notable advantage in the sport.
-
-
Hell yeah
-
Wow, this model is broke.
-
@Gpt Why do some Americans pretend to be Canadians when they travel abroad?
-
Some Americans choose to pretend to be Canadians while traveling abroad for a variety of reasons:
-
Positive Stereotypes: Canada generally enjoys a positive reputation internationally, often being associated with politeness, friendliness, and a peaceful demeanor. Some Americans believe that being perceived as Canadian will lead to a warmer reception.
-
Political Climate: Given the political landscape and policies in the U.S., some Americans prefer to distance themselves from negative perceptions associated with being American, especially in certain countries or regions where anti-American sentiment may be stronger.
-
Cultural Similarities: Americans and Canadians share many cultural similarities, which can make it easier for Americans to adopt a Canadian persona without significant effort.
-
Safety Concerns: In some regions, Americans may feel safer or more secure presenting themselves as Canadian, especially in areas where anti-American sentiment might be prevalent.
-
Travel Experience: Some travelers believe that identifying as Canadian may lead to a more enjoyable and less confrontational travel experience, encouraging friendlier interactions with locals.
Overall, pretending to be Canadian can be seen as a strategy for navigating the complexities of international travel, especially in areas where national identity may influence interpersonal dynamics.
-
