The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread
-
@madrebel said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@madrebel nice. There are a ton of benefits if they can get it working. I think they were having issues with the materials science several years ago as the salt bath is corrosive or something like that. It’s nice we can get rid of all the nuclear waste in the process and the residual waste from these plants basically is safe in a few hundred years instead of tens of thousands. I was surprised to learn that the existing fuel rods in traditional plants only spend < 10% of the fuel before they are removed and become waste.
Fast Breeders have been a thing for awhile now too. As i recall Russia had one or two pilot plants running and France had this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superphénix
Technical issues as you’d expect from first of its kind tech, including sodium corrosion problems, but they were ultimately resolved. Cost overruns and of course lots of protests, including an RPG attack … this part is the best though
On May 8, 2003, Chaïm Nissim, who in 1985 was elected to the Geneva cantonal legislature for the Swiss Green Party,[17] admitted carrying out the attack. He claimed that the weapons were obtained from Carlos the Jackal via the Belgian terrorist organisation Cellules Communistes Combattantes (Communist Combatant Cells).[18][19]
Yes, a terrorist was elected to government position. isn’t that swell.
Also Japan is doing some interesting stuff with Nuclear as part of their Hydrogen efforts.
They’re betting big on hydrogen and for a relatively small island nation that can relatively easily run a pipe network for hydrogen the length of their island it has a decent chance to work. Creating power in the process could be genius. For the US market going hydrogen has larger challenges. However I’d be curious what say 50% of cars exhausting water vapor may do for rain fall patterns, specifically for the American Southwest. I’ve looked around and haven’t seen anyone mention or consider this possibility.
Fun fact, Pakoon used to be Carlos the Jackal’s KGB handler. Also this is why I don’t trust the Swiss.
-
@Tazz said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
The approach is based on the same light-based optical data storage (ODS) approach used to write DVDs, but the twist is that it works in three dimensions. That means hundreds of layers instead of one, resulting in a massive jump in capacity.
According to the research team, we’re talking petabits on a single disc: that’s a thousand trillion bits, the equivalent of fitting around a million standard definition movies on something the size of a DVD. Stack them together, and we’re getting into the realm of exabits (a million trillion or a quintillion bits).
Basically your array ends up looking like HAL boards.
-
I missed the gmail one. Google is so bad about that shit that I actually believed it.
-
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
I missed the gmail one. Google is so bad about that shit that I actually believed it.
I’m dreading the day they sunset their MS Office competitor (I don’t know what they call it now… workspaces?) First, I’ll have to migrate 8 years of documents and pray they still work. Second, MS will double the cost of an Office subscription the next day.
-
Cunts. I mean, you’ve got to expect that behavior these days but to sell a tool as protecting your privacy while making money from selling out your privacy is a scumbag move. Avast used to be reputable back when I used their anti virus in the 2000’s.
-
Pretty common these days I think. Company gets bought along the way or management turns over and they look to monetize everything they do with no fucks given. I figured it out though. Occasionally I look at stuff so disgusting that not even they want to track it. Do that a few times and your trackers look away when you go online.
-
Corporate money grab and greed will end us all
-
@Zeppelin said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
Corporate money grab and greed will end us all
The fun part is when ultra socialists and corporate scum collude and use each other to eliminate all other competition then fight it out for final dominance.
It’s coming.
-
@Kyle How does that work?
-
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kyle How does that work?
You have already seen it in play with BLM type stuff. Banks don’t care who spends the money, they care that you can enforce the tax collection and pay.
-
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kyle How does that work?
You have already seen it in play with BLM type stuff. Banks don’t care who spends the money, they care that you can enforce the tax collection and pay.
But Blanks want’s Musk’s money, but Musk is awesome and therefore shouldn’t have to pay much. How do you get past that?
-
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kyle How does that work?
You have already seen it in play with BLM type stuff. Banks don’t care who spends the money, they care that you can enforce the tax collection and pay.
But Blanks want’s Musk’s money, but Musk is awesome and therefore shouldn’t have to pay much. How do you get past that?
If Blanks got the whole US to want electric cars, Musk will pay to play. Blanks better get him tax breaks.
-
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kyle How does that work?
You have already seen it in play with BLM type stuff. Banks don’t care who spends the money, they care that you can enforce the tax collection and pay.
But Blanks want’s Musk’s money, but Musk is awesome and therefore shouldn’t have to pay much. How do you get past that?
If Blanks got the whole US to want electric cars, Musk will pay to play. Blanks better get him tax breaks.
So capitalism is fine to Blanks as long as they are making commie hippie bullshit? How do you build income equality?
-
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Kyle How does that work?
You have already seen it in play with BLM type stuff. Banks don’t care who spends the money, they care that you can enforce the tax collection and pay.
But Blanks want’s Musk’s money, but Musk is awesome and therefore shouldn’t have to pay much. How do you get past that?
If Blanks got the whole US to want electric cars, Musk will pay to play. Blanks better get him tax breaks.
So capitalism is fine to Blanks as long as they are making commie hippie bullshit? How do you build income equality?
New Soviet Man requires genetic engineering.
-
I don’t know if it’s just an unlucky run for me in particular today, but I feel like we’ve entered an age where it’s just okay to deliver broken shit.
I subscribed to the Wall Street Journal earlier today via their app on my phone. Google happily billed me instantly but the WSJ app redirected me to a separate web page to register. That registration process shat itself and the app then asked me to login which I couldn’t because I hadn’t even got to the password part of the registration process. There’s no option to re-register, only login, so $5 wasted. I’m not adding insult to injury by wasting I don’t know how much time and energy requesting refunds or dealing with WSJ tech support so I left a one star review explaining the problem and uninstalled the app.
Then tonight I order a movie through Google Play. They gave two options, $4 for SD or $5 for HD. Okay, so I select HD and Google instantly charge me. I sit down to watch the movie and the highest quality it will give me is 480p.

Is it really that hard to perfect the art of a selling a newspaper subscription or a movie rental? Surely they do this shit at scale and this is a core part of the service. Not some oddball fucking edge case that they might be forgiven for not expecting.
/rant
-
You are lucky that you got out of WSJ. Once you get on their regular price, the only way to get out is by calling them and having a long argument with the rep about why you are worthy to cancel your subscription.
-
@Hog said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
I don’t know if it’s just an unlucky run for me in particular today, but I feel like we’ve entered an age where it’s just okay to deliver broken shit.
I subscribed to the Wall Street Journal earlier today via their app on my phone. Google happily billed me instantly but the WSJ app redirected me to a separate web page to register. That registration process shat itself and the app then asked me to login which I couldn’t because I hadn’t even got to the password part of the registration process. There’s no option to re-register, only login, so $5 wasted. I’m not adding insult to injury by wasting I don’t know how much time and energy requesting refunds or dealing with WSJ tech support so I left a one star review explaining the problem and uninstalled the app.
Then tonight I order a movie through Google Play. They gave two options, $4 for SD or $5 for HD. Okay, so I select HD and Google instantly charge me. I sit down to watch the movie and the highest quality it will give me is 480p.

Is it really that hard to perfect the art of a selling a newspaper subscription or a movie rental? Surely they do this shit at scale and this is a core part of the service. Not some oddball fucking edge case that they might be forgiven for not expecting.
/rant
I subscribed to Wired two weeks ago for five bucks a year. Worked for a week and then they wanted to charge me 29,90 bucks or something. I sent them an email and after two hours they said everything was AOK and told me that I’d get a free t-shirt or a tote bag lol
Great customer service I’d say.
-
Oh, and @Hog what does the tax base on? Cambodian?
-
@Pakoon said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
@Hog said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
I don’t know if it’s just an unlucky run for me in particular today, but I feel like we’ve entered an age where it’s just okay to deliver broken shit.
I subscribed to the Wall Street Journal earlier today via their app on my phone. Google happily billed me instantly but the WSJ app redirected me to a separate web page to register. That registration process shat itself and the app then asked me to login which I couldn’t because I hadn’t even got to the password part of the registration process. There’s no option to re-register, only login, so $5 wasted. I’m not adding insult to injury by wasting I don’t know how much time and energy requesting refunds or dealing with WSJ tech support so I left a one star review explaining the problem and uninstalled the app.
Then tonight I order a movie through Google Play. They gave two options, $4 for SD or $5 for HD. Okay, so I select HD and Google instantly charge me. I sit down to watch the movie and the highest quality it will give me is 480p.

Is it really that hard to perfect the art of a selling a newspaper subscription or a movie rental? Surely they do this shit at scale and this is a core part of the service. Not some oddball fucking edge case that they might be forgiven for not expecting.
/rant
I subscribed to Wired two weeks ago for five bucks a year. Worked for a week and then they wanted to charge me 29,90 bucks or something. I sent them an email and after two hours they said everything was AOK and told me that I’d get a free t-shirt or a tote bag lol
Great customer service I’d say.
Yeah, wow, that’s awesome.
@Pakoon said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:
Oh, and @Hog what does the tax base on? Cambodian?
Yeah, Cambodia has 10% VAT so I assume it’s that.
Edit: Although I submit tax paperwork and money monthly with revenue, salary withholding tax etc, all my revenue comes from abroad so is VAT free and I don’t know much about how it works other than in theory.
-
WaPo (free): European court favors strong encryption, calling it key to privacy rights
The thing I found interesting about that story was that the whole case and ruling was prompted by Russia being a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights. They were sued for being in breach by their laws requiring access to Telegram users’ messages. Now that the ruling exists, it’s potentially going to stop the UK’s planned similar legislation because they are also a signatory.

Avast ordered to stop selling browsing data from its browsing privacy apps