Off Topic
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread

    Tech
    22
    1.2k
    5.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PakoonP
      Pakoon
      last edited by

      Well, now I’ll go and cook some Ghoti.

      ♙♙♙ Michael Waltz added you to the group.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        Bah, I just stumbled across another one when I was looking up something else:

        CLOS stands for Common Lisp Object System and is pronounced “see loss” or “kloss”. (Opinions differ as to which is right.)

        “See ell oh ess” it is then.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Gators1G
          Gators1
          last edited by

          kloth obviously.

          alt text

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • WhoofeW
            Whoofe Gold
            last edited by

            why can’t it be pronounced My-Squeel ?

            alt text

            alt text

            If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality. In fact, of course, we all do believe that some moralities are better than others . . . . The moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard . . . admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."

            KilemallK PakoonP 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KilemallK
              Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Whoofe
              last edited by

              @Whoofe said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

              why can’t it be pronounced My-Squeel ?

              Just cause! Hush!

              https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

              Never go full Lithu-
              Twain

              No editing is gonna save you now-
              Wingmann

              http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

              http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • PakoonP
                Pakoon @Whoofe
                last edited by

                @Whoofe said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                why can’t it be pronounced My-Squeel ?

                Because we don’t know whether My squeals or not.

                ♙♙♙ Michael Waltz added you to the group.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by A Former User

                  I didn’t know it but Cambodia finally got YouTube premium a couple of months ago (it was only offered to me just today). I had their algo trained pretty well to not show excessive ads but it was a pain sometimes. If they ever showed me an ad that couldn’t be skipped after 5 seconds, I’d shut down YouTube instantly with Ctrl-W and wouldn’t open it again for 24 hours. I don’ t know if I was kidding myself but it seemed to be pretty effective; initially YT was really insistent about shoving them down my throat but it rarely happens now (maybe once a month) that I get an unskippable ad and have to do something else that night for entertainment.

                  Anyway, I’ve got premium now so that’s a game I no longer have to play.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • ?
                    A Former User
                    last edited by

                    I don’t know if this is Microsoft being their normal tone deaf selves or it’s just me but this rubs me up the wrong way:

                    Screenshot_2023-12-14-19-29-19-59_cbf47468f7ecfbd8ebcc46bf9cc626da.jpg

                    Time to get to work? I have several bosses and you aren’t one of them. In fact, you’re supposed to work for me biatch.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                    • JamJ
                      Jam
                      last edited by

                      The fact that the machine has you back-talking it . . . and you treating it like a surly boss suggests that the machine may be winning the battle. ;-)

                      "laissez les bons temps rouler!"

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • Gators1G
                        Gators1
                        last edited by

                        The AI is grooming Hog?

                        alt text

                        KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • KilemallK
                          Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Gators1
                          last edited by

                          @Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                          The AI is grooming Hog?

                          Has to break him down to get to his kid.

                          https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

                          Never go full Lithu-
                          Twain

                          No editing is gonna save you now-
                          Wingmann

                          http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

                          http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Gators1G
                            Gators1
                            last edited by

                            Lob to get $2.5B and the victims 42 cents apiece.

                            Dec 29, 2023

                            Google settles $5 billion privacy lawsuit over tracking people using 'incognito mode'

                            Google settles $5 billion privacy lawsuit over tracking people using 'incognito mode'

                            The class-action lawsuit said Google misled users into believing that it wouldn't track their internet activities while using 'incognito mode.' Terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.

                            alt text

                            Lob12L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User
                              last edited by A Former User

                              Got my bluesky invite today after being on the waiting list for months. I guess the date is no accident and there was some planned expansion of access starting on New years day. They had just under three million users at NYE and I wonder how many they added today.

                              Anyway, if you have Bluesky and are interested in tech news, I found this feed to be really good:

                              Tech by Flipboard by @bsky.flipboard.com

                              Tech by Flipboard by @bsky.flipboard.com

                              Curated by Flipboard's state of the art topics recommendation system.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Lob12L
                                Lob12 @Gators1
                                last edited by

                                @Gators1 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                                Lob to get $2.5B and the victims 42 cents apiece.

                                That’s all they deserve for using google!

                                [IMG] https://image.ibb.co/nhhF0Q/new_sig_lob12.jpg [/IMG]

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  last edited by A Former User

                                  Cal Newport  /  Feb 26, 2021  /  tags

                                  E-mail Is Making Us Miserable

                                  E-mail Is Making Us Miserable

                                  In an attempt to work more effectively, we’ve accidentally deployed an inhumane way to collaborate.

                                  Their recommendation? To “suggest that organizations make a concerted effort to cut down on email traffic.”

                                  Yeah, fucking great. By the time that message has been corporatized, the reason for it will be lost and it will turn into a directive to use Teams instead of email.

                                  I can manage email. I can ignore it while I’m busy, find stuff again when I need it and easily include people as necessary in any decisions.

                                  I can’t manage a dozen fucking Teams channels going off like a pinball machine where, if you don’t respond immediately, people think you are goofing off, where adding people is an ordeal involving decisions about how much history to share and you can never fucking find which of the five related discussions had the text you need to look at a week later.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                  • KilemallK
                                    Kilemall Careful, railroad agent
                                    last edited by

                                    Already happening at my workplace with Teams positioning itself as the continuous meeting IS the project management. Very painful already.

                                    https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

                                    Never go full Lithu-
                                    Twain

                                    No editing is gonna save you now-
                                    Wingmann

                                    http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

                                    http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      https://interestingengineering.com/science/china-russia-tested-hack-proof-quantum-communication-link

                                      Don’t know what the implications are unless the NSA were able to hack the existing comms via some unknown back door.

                                      KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • KilemallK
                                        Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        @Hog said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                                        https://interestingengineering.com/science/china-russia-tested-hack-proof-quantum-communication-link

                                        Don’t know what the implications are unless the NSA were able to hack the existing comms via some unknown back door.

                                        Besides the obvious realtime link for defense cooperation and losing the benefit of NSA hacking either cracking comms or force slower secure methods, it could also mean some new cryptocurrency to dethrone the dollar.

                                        https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

                                        Never go full Lithu-
                                        Twain

                                        No editing is gonna save you now-
                                        Wingmann

                                        http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

                                        http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

                                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User @Kilemall
                                          last edited by A Former User

                                          @Kilemall interesting.

                                          When I was porting some Bitcoin elliptic curve cryptography code to JavaScript back in 2017 I got curious about the origins of the cryptography it uses. Turns out the elliptic curve Bitcoin addresses use (secp256k1) has a bunch of constants that no one knows the origin of other than they literally came from the NSA (I’m not making that up). The crypto anarchists fucking hate it when you point that out.

                                          The US government owns Bitcoin as far as I’m concerned or at least has a back door to get the private key for any public address (which amounts to the same thing). Quantum computing will probably eventually be able to trivially crack secp256k1 even without a backdoor anyway.

                                          Secp256k1 - Bitcoin Wiki
                                          KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • KilemallK
                                            Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @A Former User
                                            last edited by

                                            @Hog said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                                            @Kilemall interesting.

                                            When I was porting some Bitcoin elliptic curve cryptography code to JavaScript back in 2017 I got curious about the origins of the cryptography it uses. Turns out the elliptic curve Bitcoin addresses use (secp256k1) has a bunch of constants that no one knows the origin of other than they literally came from the NSA (I’m not making that up). The crypto anarchists fucking hate it when you point that out.

                                            The US government owns Bitcoin as far as I’m concerned or at least has a back door to get the private key for any public address (which amounts to the same thing). Quantum computing will probably eventually be able to trivially crack secp256k1 even without a backdoor anyway.

                                            Secp256k1 - Bitcoin Wiki

                                            Right. I figured something like that was in the works, nations do not give up currency power readily. Part of why my answer when you initially asked about bitcoin was government action.

                                            I am foolish about one thing, I keep forgetting to make money off the suckers when the fundamentals are wrong but greed and emotion is high.

                                            https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

                                            Never go full Lithu-
                                            Twain

                                            No editing is gonna save you now-
                                            Wingmann

                                            http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

                                            http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post