Off Topic
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread

    Tech
    22
    1.2k
    5.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Gators1G
      Gators1
      last edited by

      How many FPS?

      alt text

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TazzT
        Tazz
        last edited by

        .9999

        GTFO

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          More than tgtcwtf

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TazzT
            Tazz
            last edited by Tazz

            Disposable drones carrying disposable passengers.

            GTFO

            WhoofeW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • WhoofeW
              Whoofe Gold @Tazz
              last edited by

              @Tazz said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

              Disposable drones carrying disposable passengers.

              so a flying Yugo then

              alt text

              alt text

              If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality. In fact, of course, we all do believe that some moralities are better than others . . . . The moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard . . . admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • O
                oyaji @Tazz
                last edited by oyaji

                @Tazz said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                OK, this is pretty cool.
                watch in full screen mode

                World News Tonight on Twitter

                Does anyone else find something wrong with a sphere that is “526 feet wide and 366 feet tall”, or is it just me?

                © 2015 - 2025 oyaji

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • KilemallK
                  Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @oyaji
                  last edited by Kilemall

                  @oyaji said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                  @Tazz said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                  OK, this is pretty cool.
                  watch in full screen mode

                  World News Tonight on Twitter

                  Does anyone else find something wrong with a sphere that is “526 feet wide and 366 feet tall”, or is it just me?

                  They are referring to the full building including seating at the base of the sphere… So no it’s just you being literalist.

                  https://i.imgur.com/hX2CMMZ.jpg

                  Never go full Lithu-
                  Twain

                  No editing is gonna save you now-
                  Wingmann

                  http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/72217/DSC_2528.JPG

                  http://s3.amazonaws.com/rrpa_photos/20416/PTOB 101_resize.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JamJ
                    Jam
                    last edited by Jam

                    It seems to be more of a hemisphere though, maybe 69% or 70% of the height of a a full sphere.

                    That actually explains the lack of full ‘sphericality’.

                    Oyaji was on to something. ;-)

                    "laissez les bons temps rouler!"

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • TazzT
                      Tazz
                      last edited by

                      This place sells all kinds of cool stuff. Check out he Manhattan Project window they sold.

                      image.png

                      $100 and Up

                      $100 and Up

                      $100 and Up - Explore our exclusive collection of $100 and Up collectibles at Mini Museum. Discover unique finds curated just for you.

                      GTFO

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        Not usually a fan of reaction thumbnails but this was amusing:

                        image.png

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User
                          last edited by A Former User

                          Lob should be wary when getting his phone or laptop repaired:

                          https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/marketplace-tech-repair-snooping-1.7000775

                          Actually, we all should. I only unlock my phone and hand it to someone if I’m watching everything they do with it.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User
                            last edited by

                            Maybe they shouldn’t be such who ares!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • TazzT
                              Tazz
                              last edited by Tazz

                              I don’t want to pre-judge her but something tells me she won’t understand ANY excuse for having that on a phone to begin with.
                              But then again she may be a warhorse in the sack.

                              image.png

                              GTFO

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JamJ
                                Jam
                                last edited by Jam

                                That Cavoukian photo needed to be improved with Photoshop. Tough on the eyes, it was.

                                You see?

                                Even with just a little knowledge, anyone can improve a photo with Photoshop.

                                7eab160d-aa88-4ccf-b39a-5a6fc5225ae6.jpg

                                "laissez les bons temps rouler!"

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  last edited by A Former User

                                  This guy shows how easy this really is:

                                  How To Make A CPU

                                  It seems there’s a conspiracy to misinform us involving Intel, TSMC etc. Clearly they don’t want us making 200 core / 400 thread CPUs in our garages and then losing their lucrative market.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                  • JamJ
                                    Jam
                                    last edited by

                                    I bet he’d make producing a vat of pistachio ice cream look easy too!

                                    "laissez les bons temps rouler!"

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User
                                      last edited by A Former User

                                      Filipe Espósito  /  Oct 23, 2023  /  News

                                      Qualcomm’s latest CPU for PCs beats Apple’s M1 and catches up with M2

                                      Qualcomm’s latest CPU for PCs beats Apple’s M1 and catches up with M2

                                      Apple has been doing a great job with its Apple Silicon “M” chips for computers, as they deliver more performance...

                                      Awesome. Looks like we’re going to start getting laptops with M1 / eventually M2+ performance and efficiency (battery life) but aren’t locked into Apple’s ecosystem.

                                      I hope Intel is seriously planning for a RISC future because x86 has no place in it IMO. Whether you’re an individual getting 50 to 100% better battery life in your laptop or a company saving a bunch of money in electricity costs, CISC doesn’t make much sense at any scale. But I could just be a RISC fanboy.

                                      Lob12L KilemallK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • Lob12L
                                        Lob12 @A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        @Hog said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                                        Filipe Espósito  /  Oct 23, 2023  /  News

                                        Qualcomm’s latest CPU for PCs beats Apple’s M1 and catches up with M2

                                        Qualcomm’s latest CPU for PCs beats Apple’s M1 and catches up with M2

                                        Apple has been doing a great job with its Apple Silicon “M” chips for computers, as they deliver more performance...

                                        Awesome. Looks like we’re going to start getting laptops with M1 / eventually M2+ performance and efficiency (battery life) but aren’t locked into Apple’s ecosystem.

                                        I hope Intel is seriously planning for a RISC future because x86 has no place in it IMO. Whether you’re an individual getting 50 to 100% better battery life in your laptop or a company saving a bunch of money in electricity costs, CISC doesn’t make much sense at any scale.

                                        I didn’t understand any of this

                                        [IMG] https://image.ibb.co/nhhF0Q/new_sig_lob12.jpg [/IMG]

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • TazzT
                                          Tazz
                                          last edited by

                                          The M1 was a tank

                                          GTFO

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • ?
                                            A Former User @Lob12
                                            last edited by A Former User

                                            @Lob12 said in The OFFICIAL tech stuff thread:

                                            I didn’t understand any of this

                                            Most of Intel’s chip production has been CPUs like the ones we’ve been using for decades in our home PCs. That is “x86” or similar. The 286, 386, 486, i3, i5 and i7 etc chips all use the x86 instruction set which is known as a “complex instruction set” or CISC. It basically means the fundamental/lowest level of programming for those chips has many instructions and many of those instructions are purpose built for very specific tasks.

                                            The competing architecture to CISC, is RISC, or, Reduced Instruction Set Computing. The philosophy behind RISC is that there are way fewer instructions and to do anything on the CPU you compose these more simple instructions into code that does the more specific or complex task. One of the benefits of RISC is that the tasks can be much more easily broken up and executed in parallel (performance) and they generally suck less power to do it (energy efficiency/battery life).

                                            RISC initially only became popular for regular people starting with phones because they had better battery performance. But then Apple shocked the industry by releasing their own Arm (RISC) chip which was really very fast and had a huge battery life (the M1). All new Macbooks since a year or two ago are all RISC. Microsoft also released Surface laptops running on Arm (RISC) chips but there hasn’t before been a non-Apple Arm chip that could compete with Apple’s own chips. That’s starting to change.

                                            I basically want a laptop with Apple M1/M2 performance and M1/M2 battery life but I don’t want one made by Apple. I was never going to get what I wanted while we were all stuck on x86.

                                            Gators1G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post