Off Topic
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Amazon
    • OT Fundraiser
    • Register
    • Login

    The OFFICIAL programming thread

    Tech
    22
    1.4k
    10.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GustafG
      Gustaf
      last edited by

      Buy a film camera.

      "Let's give it a week! Still a disaster? Let's give it another week…" -Tazz

      KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • KilemallK
        Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Gustaf
        last edited by

        @Gustaf said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

        Buy a film camera.

        I gotta guy in Switzerland…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • GustafG
          Gustaf
          last edited by

          Sweden

          "Let's give it a week! Still a disaster? Let's give it another week…" -Tazz

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • HogH
            Hog
            last edited by Hog

            I know from years of learning other shit that the SmallTalk language has been hugely influential in programming but I’ve never used it or seen it used in the wild and I was curious about it. Turns out there is a modern variant called Pharo that is under active development so I downloaded it and started playing with it last night.

            SmallTalk is kind of weird and is giving me strong Common Lisp vibes: Stupidly simple syntax and programming in a running state machine (image) where you develop by changing the program while it’s running.

            Below is what is claimed to be the full syntax of the language:

            image.png

            I just love how all this shit exists and is free for anyone to use or play with.

            KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • KilemallK
              Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Hog
              last edited by

              This post is deleted!
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • HogH
                Hog
                last edited by Hog

                If you can put aside maybe some unfamiliarity with his core argument, the below was a really interesting talk on computer history going back to the 50’s and how we got to where we are with OOP programming as it is mostly practiced today:

                Casey Muratori – The Big OOPs: Anatomy of a Thirty-five-year Mistake – BSC 2025

                Trigger warning: he comes out swinging against C++ pretty early so if you like C++ it might piss you off but the core of his argument is really against what calls something like compile time domain modelling of hierarchies - basically deep class hierarchies that model how we think of the world (Vehicle -> Car -> Sports Car). I don’t think the latter is really very controversial anymore since I’ve been hearing “favor composition over inheritance” as being the prevailing wisdom for maybe a decade or longer.

                Edit: Gemini tells me the “favor composition” advice was in Design Patterns so that goes way back.

                KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • O
                  oyaji
                  last edited by

                  2½ hour video? Maybe a DL on WiFi in town, sometime.

                  Cliff notes, anyone?

                  © 2015 - 2025 oyaji

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • HogH
                    Hog
                    last edited by

                    YouTube shorts: something magical happens

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • KilemallK
                      Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Hog
                      last edited by

                      @Hog said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                      If you can put aside maybe some unfamiliarity with his core argument, the below was a really interesting talk on computer history going back to the 50’s and how we got to where we are with OOP programming as it is mostly practiced today:

                      Casey Muratori – The Big OOPs: Anatomy of a Thirty-five-year Mistake – BSC 2025

                      Trigger warning: he comes out swinging against C++ pretty early so if you like C++ it might piss you off but the core of his argument is really against what calls something like compile time domain modelling of hierarchies - basically deep class hierarchies that model how we think of the world (Vehicle -> Car -> Sports Car). I don’t think the latter is really very controversial anymore since I’ve been hearing “favor composition over inheritance” as being the prevailing wisdom for maybe a decade or longer.

                      Edit: Gemini tells me the “favor composition” advice was in Design Patterns so that goes way back.

                      Reminds me of the logic behind zero trust- define your security structure and methods/efforts geared towards actual need, not lazy ass assumptions about what box gets whose access.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Gators1G
                        Gators1
                        last edited by

                        I guess Amazon will have to hire back those 30K people now…

                        Alexander T. Williams  /  Oct 31

                        Vibe Coding, Six Months Later: The Honeymoon’s Over

                        Vibe Coding, Six Months Later: The Honeymoon’s Over

                        Six months after the hype began, is vibe coding sustainable? We look at the pros and cons, and why blending vibes with structure is key.

                        alt text

                        HogH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • HogH
                          Hog @Gators1
                          last edited by Hog

                          @Gators1

                          Vibe coding’s strength lies in helping you find direction quickly, but vibe engineering simply isn’t there yet.

                          “Vibe engineering” being a contradiction in terms might shed some light there.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • B
                            Blanks @Hog
                            last edited by

                            @Hog said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                            @Gators1

                            Vibe coding’s strength lies in helping you find direction quickly, but vibe engineering simply isn’t there yet.

                            “Vibe engineering” being a contradiction in terms might shed some light there.

                            Stop trying to harsh our vibe dude

                            KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • KilemallK
                              Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @Blanks
                              last edited by

                              @Blanks said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                              @Hog said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                              @Gators1

                              Vibe coding’s strength lies in helping you find direction quickly, but vibe engineering simply isn’t there yet.

                              “Vibe engineering” being a contradiction in terms might shed some light there.

                              Stop trying to harsh our vibe dude

                              Another gaddam user.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • HogH
                                Hog
                                last edited by

                                Oct 30

                                Odin Programming Language

                                Odin Programming Language

                                I’m learning the Odin programming language. By default, when you save your source code the LSP reformats your code to the Odin recommended style. OK. I don’t love it when languages come with highly opinionated programming styles but I can learn to swallow my bile when it does things like replace my spaces with tabs. But then it goes and does this:

                                6644dbbe-7150-4642-a12f-cfad0754e2f1-image.png

                                What kind of un-gohly fucking terrorist aligns the case conditions with the switch?

                                rote7R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • GustafG
                                  Gustaf
                                  last edited by

                                  Isn’t Odin Finnish? You have your answer

                                  "Let's give it a week! Still a disaster? Let's give it another week…" -Tazz

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                  • rote7R
                                    rote7 @Hog
                                    last edited by rote7

                                    @Hog said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                                    OK. I don’t love it when languages come with highly opinionated programming styles

                                    That’s exactly why I try to stay far away from python.

                                    EDIT

                                    That indentation style is unacceptable to my OCB.

                                    fffg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • KilemallK
                                      Kilemall Careful, railroad agent
                                      last edited by

                                      Weenies.

                                      rote7R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • rote7R
                                        rote7 @Kilemall
                                        last edited by

                                        @Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                                        Weenies.

                                        Eighty columns ought to be enough for everybody?

                                        fffg

                                        KilemallK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • KilemallK
                                          Kilemall Careful, railroad agent @rote7
                                          last edited by

                                          @rote7 said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                                          @Kilemall said in The OFFICIAL programming thread:

                                          Weenies.

                                          Eighty columns ought to be enough for everybody?

                                          Damn straight.

                                          Plus computer don’t care about neat placement. Syntax is another matter, that’s the madness of language/OS designers.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • GustafG
                                            Gustaf
                                            last edited by

                                            Computers should be shot!

                                            "Let's give it a week! Still a disaster? Let's give it another week…" -Tazz

                                            tiggerT B O 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post